Thursday, 17 December 2009

Spurs player ratings

Given Could do very little about the first two goals (I left before the third went in and don't want to see it again.) Made a good save or two in the first half and distributed well. 6

Richards Not quite the bad old Richards but not exactly the exciting new one either. There were no total howlers (nothing as bad as the penalty he gave away here last season), but he looked a bit distracted and was often outfoxed by the intelligent Niko Kranjčar. Had a heavy burden as the team's only player with any pace. 5

Touré One major blip - losing Defoe for Spurs' second - but otherwise he defended relatively well. Serious questions have to be asked about the man's captaincy though - that was as spineless a City performance as I have seen for some time. I think that if Bellamy's knees could be relied on twice a week he would certainly have the armband. 5

Onuoha Poised for a run in the side with Lescott sidelined and he made an acceptable start. Crouch won everything in the air but that is to be expected. He can't pass with his left foot but we knew that before. 5

Sylvinho You don't have to be Rinus Michels to see that Lennon's pace against Sylvinho was going to present problems. As soon as Lennon realised quite how slow Sylvinho was - and how little help he was going to get from Robinho - Spurs' opening the scoring with a move down our left flank was inevitable. Didn't look like a bad footballer when we had the ball, and is not the first full back to be exposed by Lennon, but it was still painful. 4

Ireland Told us what we knew before: when pushed out wide in a 4-4-2 he will drift inside but fail to influence the game as much as he might, but when playing in the hole, with two holding midfielders behind him and three forwards ahead of him he is an excellent player. Clearly enjoyed pulling the strings at the end even if it was a lost cause. Whether Hughes will rebuild the team around him in 2010, I'm not sure. I doubt it though. 6

de Jong
Did not look to have fully shaken off swine flu. A few big tackles early on but tended to look off the pace. Let Palacios and Huddlestone dominate the midfield, which was a disappointment after his success against Chelsea last week. 5

Barry
From a technical perspective he did well. His touch and passing were not quite at August levels but certainly better than in recent weeks. But questions have to be asked about his role: this is a guy who came with 30+ England caps and almost 400 Premier League games at Villa. With that experience he should be marshalling the midfield, to put Spurs under pressure and rally the troops when behind. But he didn't. At least we know why Hughes didn't give him the captaincy. 5

Robinho
Threatened to play well in the first quarter of an hour, with a few nice touches and movements inside, and a shot from distance that Gomes palmed over. But then it was the same performance we've seen too many times before - not getting involved in the game, not helping out his full-back, not showing any particular interest in the match or in the team. There is no choice between him and Craig Bellamy. 4

Tévez
Our one forward who looked like making a difference, he ran hard and tried things, even if nothing was quite coming off for him. Had a few shots in the first half without getting anywhere. Big question over whether he can play lone striker - if so we can easily switch to 4-3-3 to get best out of Ireland. 6

Adebayor
Woeful. Like Santa Cruz at St. Andrew's but worse, and with fewer excuses. He barely won a single header, he barely made a single run for Ireland or Robinho to pick him out, he drifted into wide positions and then failed to do anything with the ball. Not since Joey Barton have I had as much disdain for a blue as I do currently for this guy. African Cup of Nations cannot come quick enough. 3

Subs:

RSC
An improvement on Adebayor (see above). He won one or two headers and moved well enough. Not 100% yet but getting there. Needs more games before January. 6

Petrov
One decent run but didn't look like he was going to change the game. n/a

15 comments:

Anonymous said...

Everyone gets a big fat zero from me apart from

Tevez 6

Disgraceful performance and to top it off a disgraceful Alan Wiley.

I have just joined the Hughes out brigade officially as the blame is solely on his shoulders for this disgraceful lose to an average team.

stoney said...

Cityblue. How can you slag off wiley? I was at the game and city lost because they were rubbish and spurs wanted it more. You're making excuses for your pathetic bunch of lightweight overpaid mercenaries. You got beaten by a better team. And I put emphasis on the word TEAM.

Rank Foundation said...

You don't have to be Rinus Michels to see that Lennon's pace against Sylvinho was going to present problems. made me chuckle!

i have to say, it all nice and easy to blame robinho, but he was by no means the worse offender. Even with the players you gave the highest ratings, they had serious faults. In the brief spell that we dominated at the start, it was tevez who selfishness led to several wasted opportunites on the ball, he held on for too long or made a poor shot. Ireland didnt really connect any passes, he lost the ball alot and couldnt win it back, two woeful challenges on defoe sums that up¬
We didnt look like a team, a lesser side such as spurs did!

robinho not given the same excuse as santa cruz then? he's been out for a long time with an inury, hasnt played 90 mins, in a team that isnt really performing, but yea lets criticise him!

TLDORC said...

After a season and a half of abject performances away from home I don't think Robinho deserves the benefit of the doubt to which Santa Cruz is still entitled.

Rios Dos Santos said...

True that..

Still he IS a regular Brazil international.
Why can't he play decent football?
Is it too cold?
Rest of the team not good enough?
Bad tactics?
Premier League doesn't suit his style?

I just don't know anymore..
I just don't care anymore..
argh.

Anonymous said...

To Stoney,

Ill tell you how but firstly I blame Mark Hughes and my opinion on the matter is, Mark Hughes needs to be fired and replaced by Jose Mourinho before Man United beat us to it because lets face facts, Mourinho is the next best Manager.

But getting to the point, I was also at the game and Alan Wiley allowed Spurs to get away with a clear penalty which could have turned the game up on its ugly head so despite the fact Mark Hughes is ultimately to blame, Alan Wiley on the night was for Spurs and against City and the statistics and facts favour my opinion.

Rios Dos Santos said...

At least Chelski have mercenaries that perform..

stoney said...

Cityblue. Yes, I admit you should have had a penalty but it wasn't because wiley had it in for city. Only a five year old would come up with such an excuse. And that's all your arguement is... A poor excuse. He made one mistake. Your manager and players made mistake after mistake after mistake. Face it... You don't have a team, just a bunch of talented individuals.

TLDORC said...

When was this penalty?

stoney said...

JPB. I presume he is bleating about when the ball struck dawson's arm.

city_slacker said...

If by 'the ball struck dawson's arm' you mean 'blatant and deliberate volleyball-esque handpass back to Gomes', then I agree, this may be the incident Cityblue referred to

stoney said...

City slacker. I suppose you think it was all wiley's fault as well. To highlight that moment is only ignoring the real reasons you lost. I didn't deny it should have been a penalty but even if you had scored from the spot it wasn't going to be the game changing event city blue seems to think it would have been. You need heart and desire for that and your players were lacking that through out. If only your players showed the obvious love of city you and city blue display you wouldn't be grasping at straws.

city_slacker said...

you suppose wrong. dont incorrectly extrapolating my view from one comment, we were crap. but that doesn't change the one part I commemnt on. i know you agree it's a pen, fair enough, just don't assume most city fans are one-eyed. in fact, most jpb readers are realists. (excuse punctuation. im eating. i said realists not well-mannered)

satis said...

My 5 pence worth.
+ Hughes got his tactics wrong. 4-3-3 left holes in midfield, Sylvinho exposed and nothing in the usually productive wide right. I can't believe he didn't change it at half time.
+ for the liner to miss Dawson's handball required remarkable myopia.
+ Robinho and Adebayor are going to be sold in the summer.
+ Hughes will buy a centre half, a left back, a creative midfielder and a striker in January.
+ Toure is no captain.

pjdemers said...

A quick note "Hughes out" brigade. My problem with this train of thought is that this group seems to subscribe to the "magic bullet" theory that a change of manger will cure all our ills. I find this incredibly short-sighted as there are no managers readily available who would be an immediate upgrade. The idea that Mourinho would come to City is an absolute pipe dream, and Hiddink is much too close to Abramovich to go to any EPL club other than Chelsea.

The simple fact of the matter is that there is plenty of time for Hughes to get it sorted out. Personally speaking I think ESPN Man City columnist Wallace Poulter has hit the nail firmly on the head when he stated that much of our problems stem from the fact that we haven't replaced Elano with a like-minded midfield schemer who can spot the clever runs that players like Ireland , Bellamy constantly make. The match against Spurs was crying out for an inventive passer. The foundation is there and I firmly agree that this is an element we are currently lacking. I'm quite confident that if we go into the market in January, Hughes will be looking to sign a creative midfielder.