Saturday, 13 June 2009

Season ratings: midfielders

Nigel de Jong (16 starts, 0 goals)

Bought at great expense in the January window, to add some experience and steel to midfield. As was the case with our buying Shay Given, fans managed to gloss over just how lucky we were to get a player of his quality; Holland's first choice holding midfielder, previously of Ajax and HSV. If you want to see how far we've come since Gillingham, just look at the relative quality of our Dutch holding players. Twelve years ago we bought Gerard Wiekens, never-capped by the Oranje, from BV Veendam in the Dutch second tier. Six years ago we got Paul Bosvelt, a thirty-three year old on the down slope of his career, with a handful of international caps to his name. And now our takeover allows us to buy twenty four year old Dutch international regulars from Hamburg. Anyway, it was always going to be difficult for him this season: he'd spent much of autumn 2008 out injured, was dropped straight into the City team but could not play half of our games - due to UEFA rules. His energy, tough tackling and efficient passing did improve the team, but we'll have to wait until 2009/10 to see him really at his best. B

Elano (31 starts, 8 goals)

Splits opinion between City fans like no other. Had a wonderful start to his City career in the opening months of the Eriksson regime but then faded as last season ground to a halt. Suffered from the outset this season with the arrival of Robinho - which forced Mark Hughes to abandon the 4-4-1-1 which he had deployed in the opening games, adopting instead a 4-3-3 system. With no trequartista position, Elano could only play in central midfield, where he was consistently outshone by Stephen Ireland. Faltering performances led to a bust-up with Hughes, and he was not included in the squad of eighteen for the trip to West Brom in December. Returned to the side regularly in April and put in some performances which recalled his glory days of 2007; his two woodwork-hitting freekicks against Hamburg, his assist for Robinho at Goodison Park and all of those penalties (only Lampard is better in the Premier League) reminded us what he can do. But once the season ended, he demanded a new contract and now looks set for a move to Serie A. A shame, but not as much as some City fans think. B

Gelson Fernandes (9 starts, 2 goals)

I quite liked Fernandes last year - he wasn't the finished product but he ran around alot and wasn't afraid to put his foot in. But he's had a poor season, and is surely set for a summer exit. He played a bit in the season's opening months, but after a stupid red card cost us the game against Spurs he was always out of favour. In the last few months he became a useful time-wasting substitute, although it was alway a shame when his introduction was booed by the fans. C-

Dietmar Hamann (8 starts, 1 goal)

Another midfielder who could not replicate his performances under Eriksson for the Hughes regime. As his legs started to give way, he was asked to do more and more and with them - no longer allowed the luxury of having the team built around him as was the case under Sven. Once Kompany and then de Jong arrived, his chances were always going to be limited. One of the four players whose last game for City was the 3-0 FA Cup loss to Forest in January. C-

Stephen Ireland (48 starts, 13 goals)

In strictly football terms, the story of the season: after three faltering, inconsistent years, Ireland gloriously found his voice as a footballer in 2008/09. It was arguably the best season had by a City player since Ali Benarbia's miraculous 2001/02, and at times his vision and craft were reminiscent of the Maghreb magician. But that doesn't tell us half of it. In fact, the crucial point is that this was the year when Ireland married the technical gifts he's always had to a new-found strength, consistency and will to win. And in synthesising the best elements of his two boyhood heroes - Eric Cantona and Roy Keane - he can become a distinctly City hero himself.

All this, and he wasn't even in the team on opening day. He came on at Villa Park with fifteen minutes left, and sparked City into action. He was selected for the next game against West Ham, and never looked back. He won the Player of the Month awards in August, September, October and November - but that does not indicate his failing to maintain his standards into the new year, but rather his teammates finally catching up; it was Ireland's season-long consistency that made the PFA's award of Young Player of the Year to Ashley Young all the more ludicrous. It's hard to pick out the best moments: his second goal at the KC Stadium, his three assissts and one goal against Hull at home, his pass, sprint and finish in the first minute at the Nordbank Arena, a similar goal at Goodison Park, his chip to Robinho to score against WBA. But the happiest he's made us this year was when he signed a new contract last month, committing his long-term future to the club. A (and TLDORC Player of the Season)

Vincent Kompany (44 starts, 1 goal)

As good a piece of business as City have done in years: costing as much as Georgios Samaras or just £1m more than Jon Macken. Like his fellow August import Pablo Zabaleta, has excelled in both defence and midfield; as he demonstrated in his debut against West Ham when he had fifty brilliant minutes in holding midfield, before Ben Haim knocked out Richards and Kompany had forty immaculate minutes at centre-half. With his size, strength and bravery he recalls Sylvain Distin, but Kompany's much more comfortable in possession than he ever was. Had he played all year he would have been in competition for Player of the Season - he won the January award, but he barely looked fit from January onwards, thanks to a toe injury he could never really shake off. One of the reasons that Hamburg let him go so cheaply was his dreadful injury record there, and as he struggled to regain fitness I worried he may face the same problems here. And with the arrival of Gareth Barry his positions in central midfield and as captain-in-waiting are both threatened; could Hughes unite him with Onuoha at centre-back next season? A-

Shaun Wright-Phillips (37 starts, 8 goals)

In any other year this could have been the main story: the return of the prodigal son, arguably the best player ever produced by the City Academy, who assured his role as a City legend with the goals and running we all remember. When he scored twice on his re-debut at the Stadium of the Light it seemed like this would be the case. But days later ADUG bought City and City bought Robinho, and the SWP return story was pushed to the margins of our attention. I'm not sure, though, that this distraction was entirely a bad thing for Wright-Phillips. Because I don't think he went on to have a particularly good season. He had some very good games and scored a few very good goals, but he was just as inconsistent as Robinho or Elano: two good games would be followed by three poor ones, he went missing against bigger and better defenders, and he would not always produce in away games. Of course, I still love him - but I wouldn't be shocked if Hughes invests in a better right winger over the summer. B

Finally, then, two midfielders whose seasons were ruined by injury: Martin Petrov and Michael Johnson. They were both regulars in August and September before suffering long term knee and abdominal problems respectively. Petrov returned for a few games in April/May and while Johnson managed a reserve game then he never made it back to the first team. I can't really award either of them marks, suffice to say that we missed them both and will be much better off in 2009/10 with them both playing.

4 comments:

Wigan Blue said...

Mmmm.. Well thought out piece, although I'd beg to differ in one or two areas. You've missed out Petrov and Robinho, presumably saving them for a later article. Fair enough, but I would have thought if you were going to include SWP in the midfield then both Petrov (alright he didn't play too many games, but neither did Didi Hamann) and Robinho (played out on the left wing all season) should have been included.

You've given Stevie Ireland a lot of credit, which of course I wouldn't disagree with. Slightly less so for SWP, who I think was more influential early in the season than you seem to have him down for. However, both players suffered a distinct downturn in performance at around the same time - mid January onwards, and I think both looked a bit tired as the season went on.

You obviously like our dutch midfield pair. I like their ball-winning capabilities. I don't want to get into the merits of playing two defensive midfielders home and away - the team selection wasn't their fault, and they played when they were told to play. Personally I feel that Zabaleta performed better than de Jong in the DM role, but again there's an element of personal preference there. What I would criticise both Kompany and de Jong for though, is their distribution. Both appear to be completely incapable of passing the ball forwards, and when that is wedded to Dunne and Onouha's notoriously poor distribution (the word hoofing is commonly used in connection with both), it's a recipe for midfield stagnation, and constant loss of possession.

Other than that, your assessment is fair. I think Elano has been driven out now, so there isn't much point discussing where he's been played for most of the season. And I don't think Gelson will be around too much longer, although I like your description of him as a useful time-wasting substitute. Mmmm.. !!

TLDORC said...

I meant to include Petrov and Johnson in a section at the end - which I've now done - but thanks for picking it up. I'm classing Robinho as a forward, because Fantasy Premier League does. Re: Kompany and de Jong, I agree that they're both better at just keeping the ball rather than necessarily moving play forward, which is why Barry is such a good buy. de Jong + Barry + Ireland is a much more balanced midfield three, presuming we stick with the 4-3-3 next year. The problem, though, is what we then do with Kompany.

Unknown said...

I think the requirement for a right sided winger, of better quality than SWP, you mention is already in hand - every time i see young Vladimir Weiss play I get more and more excited. The kid's nearly as tricky as Robinho and as he put it himself, "my job is to beat my defender" which I don‘t necessarily agree with but it does make for entertaining viewing if he can do it and produce a quality ball at the end of it.

For what it's worth i think Kompany's passing is under-rated and to expect anything more than an 8 yard ball to a colleague from de Jong is ambitious. I don't know of any hard tackling defensive midfielders with a 65 yard cross field ball in their locker.

pjdemers said...

While I agree that the ball distribution of both Kompany and Dejong can be found wanting or overly cautious, they are on the field to help city retain possession and to protect the back four, particularly as both Onouha & Dunne are not exactly comfortable bringing the ball up out the back.
I think one of the biggest priorities for City is to find a ball playing central defender (though I do suspect with the acquisition of Barry, Kompany can fulfill this role as central defense is his natural position).

I certainly can understand how many a City fan could see fielding both Kompany and DeJong as negative but their presence allowed Robinho, Ireland, SWP and Elano the ability to try and exploit their offensive capabilities to maximum effect.

As far as Elano is concerned, as much as I would hate to see him go, much of the state of limbo in which he now finds himself is a mess of his own making. While the man is immensely talented he more often than not leaves me the impression that he plays for himself (at least in the first half of the season). I think one of the main reasons why MH decided to drop him was to hit home the point that no player is above the team.

While his performances alone this past spring probably justify a continued starting role, his decision to go public to demand a new contract even though he has two years remaining smacks of a man trying to manipulate his popularity with the City faithful rather than Hughes trying to drive him out. If nothing else he could have quietly negotiated a new contract behind closed doors. That he didn't doesn't do anything to lessen the suggestion that he's a disruptive presence off the field.